Emergent DisOrder | johnpapola.org

Note: I often have links set to open in a new tab & try to indicate that using the mouse hover popup.

(Last edited/updated July 27, 2025)

May 24, 2023 - That moment when you realize your hair identifies as a Black woman and everything in your life changes for the better. This moment hair dryer is pure genius.

Note: I didn't put a lot of effort into this page at this point & there may be added content.

This dude, John Papola, publishes articles & videos as part of a collaboration, which he may head, under a pretentious title of "Dad Saves America" which I came across and subscribed to, although there's a different author that I'm more impressed with. There's a conservative leaning for the content & ostensibly moderate although he goes into vaccine conspiracies & the like. All these wealthy white people don't want covid vaccines because the virus doesn't affect them that much. Any crisis will be disproportionably more detrimental for impoverished, and minorities are disproportionably represented in the impoverished stratum since they typically will reside in more dense populated urban areas, so the pandemic would affect them more. The overall attitude of these people in John Papola's little cult is that their the ones who are in the position to make the reasonable, rational decisions that the people in the lower caste just don't have the courage to. He has a bachelor's degree and discusses "socialism", & "Marxism" but to provide bias. I admit that I'm no expert on economics, but neither is he. I tried to read some of Karl Marx and it didn't take me long to understand that he was a non-racist humanitarian. Whatever people did under the guise of his suggested ideology isn't his fault & he probably ended up crazy since people hated him.

John Papola's all about sectarianism and yet there are child tax credits and child care tax rebates which are socialist programs. He's against transgender experimentaion, which is good, but there's capitalism inherent in the agenda (as well as electroconvulsive treatments, but he doesn't care about that ... not sensational enough) and I noticed he alluded to that fact so he's all ok with contradiction. He's got this "deep-state woke" people to blame for inconsistancies with his platform. I can only assume that at least some of that idea of hidden "liberal" level of gov't is, in fact, the aspect of the sociology of past experts that shaped programs which provide benefits to people who've suffered some of the most atrocious kinds of trauma ... survivors of child abuse, rape, etc., and of course the stereotype of a person, tough and hardened, all for the better because of it since it'd be weak for the toxicity to have any lasting effect. That's embarrassing. The idea that any family abuse was strictly just parent(s) or consistant and predictable ... siblings would always know & understand it wasn't normal if asked about their childhood later in life, and a child or person was never abused because others abused them. ← Oh, now that last one was the real kicker, right? Like that'd ever happen. What's even more ironic is that there are people who were so abused that they're not able to interact much with anyone outside their families. Other's "like" them, sure ... and there are programs and such for people in the demographic to attend for socializing, but the coffers funding the programs are being robbed.

Now that I mentioned all of that the typical canned, tough-guy retort is something along the lines of "omg, your talking about those mouth-breathers pervs! Oh you're sick!" and as been mentioned millions of times now, there were other cultures in the past which were convinced of such dehumanizing ideology to the point of exterminating anyone who wasn't a narcissist. Some of the people in my previous paragraph are unable to work, or some do to an extent. The issue here is that they're dependent on the same family who abused them (or were complicit with abuse) and expecting a person to survive as an adult without any income, whatsoever, to where they'd have to depend on others for toiletries, even, is really not very reasonable. There of course gets to be temptation to scrutinize the whole eligibility determination system, like there must be something that they all never understood, the people that created the programs and all, many Republicans (who weren't nosey busybodies), and there lies your hokey "deep-state".

I've been informally, but specifically educated in the application of the U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment of equal protection of law with regards to my demographic by people with masters degrees & doctorates with decades experience in human/social services fields. The real crux of it all is that there exists a demographic of people who others, by their hubris & arrogance, will insist that the law getting involved will only be to their detriment. "Let's not open that can of worms & lure the skeletons out of the closet!" The incidents that often get public attention is where a knife-wielding "mentally-ill" person is shot by police and nobody stops to think that maybe just don't do anything except wait for the person to tire out since the knife or other non-firearm weapon only has a small range to be effective. There's the expected expediency ... instant gratification to satisfy. (The mob rules.)

"Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in the way of a brother." Romans 14:13
There's the concept of collective punishment, which is really a type of public humiliation, and I'm not contesting the use of the tactic in controlled environments (e.g., athletics for team unification, or military training), but it can be natural occurence in group dynamics and is abusive. Of course with sociology, being a science of human condition, and humans aren't always predictable, there can always be anecdotes or examples given to contradict just about any case, but sometimes even then there's embellishment or lie. To be more specific someone can insist that some event or incident wasn't as harmful as described ... "everybody gets bullied", type thing. "Stand up to bullies" too, sure, but in that case the bullying may have gone unnoticed and only the "stand up to the bully" part was witnessed by an adult alliance of said bully and social science can be a bitch!

Taking the verse I supplied in consideration again, it could be pointed out that even back then, the idea of bullying wasn't new, trip someone up for shear fun of the reaction garnered and now it's recorded on video. St. Paul had a liberal education too, it'd stand to reason that he would've known a bit of philosophy & math so was a rational man. Some of us have determined that Mary Magdalene is author of Fourth Gospel, it's been debated but an expert, Prof. Paul D Anderson at George Fox U (Quaker college), is certain that it's a man but of course his job depends on that posit. My contention is that a man wouldn't risk bringing up suspicions of stealing from group funds and there was incident with the woman & perfume that was brought up only there. If it's taken into consideration that His cross was poles slashed together in a X, and he was tied to it too, then their reality is more within what could be accepted. It's what always has been issue ... oh and I just realized segue into evolution ideology ... unproven science. People bring up pulling wisdom teeth but not taken into account is the nutrition aspect ... but now I open up to hokey conspiracy "re-education". That along with thinking Elon Musk is a wonderful man when he's white, talks about being discriminated against, has a bunch of children and talks outright about world population ... oh, I know he wants to burn up his billions shooting off our planet's resources to Mars ... oh, listen to me I'm materialistic. There's nobody living in underwater cities so maybe there's a bit more reality to think about. I'll grant you that Trump hasn't mentioned that from what I know... doesn't sound like something he'd be about. Obama did though and he recently brought up needing to be prepared for friends with non-binary children ... you're a bigot unless you're cool with such insanity. Here I have a commemorative website for Miki Manigault but nobody cares.

Saddam had tons of chemical weapons and a couple years warning to dispose of them so thinking that is all bullshit is racist. I never would've thought the information could be completely dismissed when he was murdering thousands. Poor people don't count ... I shoulda known that much. In a video, John Papola immediately uses phrase "the forces of victimhood" when his whole entire posit is that he is a victim. Oh, if a person is a victim of a few assaults then odds are it's the victim's fault since that sorta thing wouldn't happen otherwise... I'm not sure where the delimiter is beween being a victim of brutal crime and being just the person's role in life. Gives people like John Papola something to discuss, instead of actually doing something about anything.

This is a sociology presentation (work in progress) about John Papola & his "Emergent Order", which I suppose is intended to be catchy & serious & inspiring, etc.